Anonymous Tip Arrest. Police Use of Excessive Force Not Basis For Suppression.

USA v. Calvin Watson, 08-1938.  The defendant appeals from his conviction for illegal possession of guns and ammunition, for which he was sentenced to six years in prison. The only question is the legality of the seizure of the weapons, which were essential evidence of his guilt.

A police officer...

Anonymous Tip Arrest. Police Use of Excessive Force Not Basis For Suppression. Continue reading…

USSG 3C1.1 Obstruction of Justice. Warning: Defendant’s Friend Nicely Asking a Witness Not to Testify is Obstruction.

USA v. Adonis House, 07-4043.   A federal jury convicted Adonis House of two counts of distribution of crack cocaine, and the district court sentenced him to 188 months in prison, followed by five years of supervised release.  On appeal,  contends that the district court improperly made a two-point adjustment to his base offense...

USSG 3C1.1 Obstruction of Justice. Warning: Defendant’s Friend Nicely Asking a Witness Not to Testify is Obstruction. Continue reading…

Theory of Defense Jury Instructions: Boilerplate Rules With Limitations Explained.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CALVIN BRUCE.  07-3675.

Mr. Bruce's first basis for appeal is that he was deprived of the right to a fair trial by the district court's refusal to give his proposed jury instruction, which stated that the police violated Wisconsin law by failing to record...

Theory of Defense Jury Instructions: Boilerplate Rules With Limitations Explained. Continue reading…

Sophisticated Means and USSG 2B1.1(9)(c) – Boilerplate Analysis

USA v. Ronald E. Wayland, 08-2194.  A jury found Ronald E. Wayland guilty of making false statements relating to health care matters, in violation of18 U.S.C. §§ 1035(a)(2), 24(b). At sentencing, the district court concluded that Mr. Wayland used "sophisticated means" to perpetrate the fraud and, accordingly, applied a two-level upward adjustment to...

Sophisticated Means and USSG 2B1.1(9)(c) – Boilerplate Analysis Continue reading…

Cooperating Defendant Gets No Substantial Assistance Motion From Government. Or, Where To Start When the Government Bleeps Your Client

USA v. Darnell C. Billings, 07-2307. 

Defendant Darnell Billings received a statutory minimum sentence of life imprisonment after pleading guilty to dealing over 50 grams of crack cocaine. He claims the government should have rewarded his cooperation by filing a substantial assistance motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e), which...

Cooperating Defendant Gets No Substantial Assistance Motion From Government. Or, Where To Start When the Government Bleeps Your Client Continue reading…

USSG 5G1.3. Consecutive v. Concurrent Sentence Analysis

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
STANLEY F. JACKSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.   07-3226.

Stanley F. Jackson pled guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Jackson was on probation and supervised release when he committed the charged offense . At sentencing, Jackson requested...

USSG 5G1.3. Consecutive v. Concurrent Sentence Analysis Continue reading…