Chicago Federal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro Success at Dirksen

Success at Dirksen Building. Chicago Criminal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro fought tooth and nail against the government’s Petition for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture. The petition sought proceeds and specific property including substitute assets. The Judge listened to Mr. Petro’s arguments and dismissed the government’s petition. Savings to client $550K!

Chicago Federal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro Success at Dirksen Continue reading…

FRE 404(b): New Test to Admit

US v. Nicolas Gomez,  No. 12-1104  .

Editors Note:  Chicago Federal Criminal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro Represented Gomez at his Motion to Suppress Evidence, at trial, on direct appeal and in this en banc appeal. 

Before WOOD, Chief Judge, and BAUER, POSNER, FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, KANNE, ROVNER, WILLIAMS, SYKES, TINDER, and...

FRE 404(b): New Test to Admit Continue reading…

5th Amendment: Silence and Not Answering Police Questions Is Now Evidence

Salinas v. Texas, 133 S. Ct. 2174 (2013)

Without being placed in custody or receiving Miranda warnings, Salinas voluntarily answered the questions of a police officer who was investigating a murder. But petitioner balked when the officer asked whether a ballistics test would show that the shell casings found at the...

5th Amendment: Silence and Not Answering Police Questions Is Now Evidence Continue reading…