Michael J. Petro argues in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on November 17, 2015

PRESS RELEASE (Chicago) – On November 18, 2015, Chicago Federal Criminal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro will argue in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.  US v. Acasio Sanchez, 15-1356.  In his brief, Mr. Petro argues that the district court improperly sentenced Mr. Sanchez by applying the “stash house” enhancement in the United States Sentencing Guidelines. ...

Michael J. Petro argues in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on November 17, 2015 Continue reading…

FRE 902(11). Boilerplate Rules for Admission of Certified Business Records

USA v. James Green. 09-3098.

The government charged defendant James Green with four counts of wire fraud. His cousin, co-defendant Joseph Green, recruited Green to purchase properties in exchange for cash. Throughout the trial, Green argued that he was a victim of the fraudulent scheme, left holding the...

FRE 902(11). Boilerplate Rules for Admission of Certified Business Records Continue reading…

18 USC 1001: False Statements Must Be Material to the Federal Government

William Patrick Clark’s trucking business was hired to perform hauling services on a state-and federally funded highway project in Missouri. Because federal funds were in play, Clark’s contract with the project’s general contractor required that he pay his truck drivers the federal prevailing wage pursuant to the Davis-Bacon Act (which, at the...

18 USC 1001: False Statements Must Be Material to the Federal Government Continue reading…

Entrapment: Presence of Several Inducement Plus Factors Leads to REVERSAL

US v. James Barta.  No. 13-3208.

Defendant James Barta has appealed his conviction for conspiracy to commit bribery. He was charged and convicted based on an undercover government sting operation that evolved into an agreement among Barta and his co-defendants to bribe a fictional county official in California...

Entrapment: Presence of Several Inducement Plus Factors Leads to REVERSAL Continue reading…

Drug Conspiracy: Buyer/Seller Arrangement Alone is NOT Enough

US v. Herberto Pulgar,  No. 14-3503 .

Drug-distribution conspiracies hold a unique position in our legal sufficiency jurisprudence. In these special cases, we will overturn a conviction when the plausibility of a mere buyer-seller arrangement is the same as the plausibility of a drug-distribution conspiracy. See United States v. Johnson, 592...

Drug Conspiracy: Buyer/Seller Arrangement Alone is NOT Enough Continue reading…