FRE 404(b): Hamilton Dissent Explains Proper District Court FRE 404(b) Analysis

United States v. Nicolas Gomez,  No. 12-1104.    

Editor’s Note.  Chicago Criminal Defense Attorney represented Mr. Gomez at trial and on appeal.  Mr. Gomez’s case is currently pending a Petition for Rehearing En Banc in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.      

A jury found Nicolas Gomez...

FRE 404(b): Hamilton Dissent Explains Proper District Court FRE 404(b) Analysis Continue reading…

FRCP 32: U. S. Probation Officer’s Confidential Recommendation to the District Court Passes Constitutional Scrutiny

United States v. Ollie Peterson, No. 12-2484.

Defendant Ollie Peterson pled guilty to one count of bank robbery in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) after robbing a bank to pay off a debt with a drug dealer. During Peterson’s sentencing hearing, the district court read from a portion...

FRCP 32: U. S. Probation Officer’s Confidential Recommendation to the District Court Passes Constitutional Scrutiny Continue reading…

Mandatory Minimum Sentences Do NOT Violate Separation of Powers Doctrine

USA v. Steven J. Nigg, 11-2340.      

Under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), any person convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm who has “three previous convictions… for a violent felony … committed on occasions different from one another” is subject to a mandatory minimum...

Mandatory Minimum Sentences Do NOT Violate Separation of Powers Doctrine Continue reading…